![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tempus Fugit
I have to write this down before I forget... |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 January 2001 NAMM 2001:: I'm getting ready to head down to Anaheim to meet up with the Phead crew, jesuspark, frizz and co. I guess this will be the year of REASON. After the much anticipated release of the propellerheads latest application, the curious will not be disappointed. I'm just looking foward to seeing everyone again. Tage has posted some images of the Propellerheads Booth at the Anaheim Convention Center on the Prop's site. It's hard to beleive that a year has passed already since I was trying to piece together the MIDI file for the old Reason Demo, Archer. Unfortunately, the old "Realizer" file formats are not compatable with Reason. I _could_ start over from the original cubase song file and manually translate the song into Reason, but i'm just being lazy. hmm... My flights delayed by an hour. Maybe i'll start working on this now... anyhoo...more stuff later, if and when I actually arrive there. :-)
16 January 2001 REASON:: I've made my REASON ARCHIVE publicly accessable. This doesn't mean that there isn't a private page for subscribers--there still is and I will be updating that page shortly. I've posted up a new reason hardware configuration. It's a rudimentary multitap delay which uses a Mixer and 8 delay units . There's a second version of the multitap delay which uses 3 mixers and 8 delay units with tap feedback wired into the Delay Array. The latter SuperTap works much better. This File will be distributed in my next newsletter. Recently it's been brought to my attention that Computer Music Magazine has yet again put some of my hard work on their CD-Rom distributed with their publication.I know the loopholes which allows Computer Music Magazine leverage...They downloaded the mods from the Official Propellerheads archives and my samples from analoguesamples.com, so I have no grounds for justified litigation. There is a deeper "ethical" issue here. I would like to see the articles they have written and would even purchase the back issues, but I can't even place an order. I don't know who's fault it is that the orders were not processed - but I do blame the publication in general for not trying. Anyhoo...enough bitching...It's just that if anyone should be conscientious of intellectual property rights, it should be a publication like Computer Music, otherwise it paves the way for stealing intellectual property and profitting from people's generosity. Let's face it - the only reason they add those CD-roms with their Magazine is to increase sales, and obviously it works, because they've added (to my knowledge) my work in three different instances over the past 3 years. I'm just peeved that I can't even get copies of those issues :-) Intellectual Property:: The rules of all the content are the same...Users are free to download, and use the Mods, Samples, and other Miscellaneous files for their own artistic pursuits. The Files are not allowed to be resold (especially on a Computer Music Magazine CD-Rom) as part of sample collections or song collections, etc. without my written permission. In most cases, I'm very willing to allow this without consideration other than being credited as the creator. 13 January 2001
9 January 2001 TXT:: 2001 is getting off to a slow start. I've been busy with a bunch of crap (literally and figuratively) One nice thing about technology though. What used to take me a full day of work to do on a 386 now only takes me 45 minutes on a G4 - after I finish that scripting, next year it should only take 5 minutes. I've been working on a revised version of Eyes Inside. It's finally coming out a way that I like. The Reason song file is already 10 Megs and it barely plays on the G3/300. It's peaking out the CPU usage meter on the MP G4, and I'm still not finished. One odd thing I've noticed with reason is that age old problem of having _too_ many options. It's very easy to go off on tangents and explore different possibilities. Typically, a track takes me about 30 days of work or 72 intense hours. The former can translate into several months of going over a track; adding and subtracting elements; rearranging; remixing; changing sounds or keys. It's more or less composition by trial and error. A lot of these projects get scrapped because they just don't work for me. Eyes Inside could easily become one of these tracks, but I'm going to push it through - I will get it eventually. Paradigm shift took me about 3 months, but Axis Mundi took a few hours. It comes and it goes.... I envy these guys who can come up with stuff in a matter of hours, but then again, what I'm doing doesn't involve a lot of cut and paste. I've been going in an editing the midi data directly in the somewhat limited sequencer and toiling with that velocity lane bug that wasn't fixed in the release version of Reason 1.0. The other day, i rendered about 14 different audio tracks from the reason file and imported them into Pro Tools. I then proceeded to do some "kung fu" to the drums and stuff. I realize now that i need two machines: One for recording and One for Dr.REXs. Maybe I'll give this a shot and slave reason to the Pro Tools 5 MIDI clock and see what happens. Tomorrow I go to MacWorld to see those new Titanium PowerBook G4 - mmm they look tasty. Maybe it's time to retire my old Wallstreet. to quote Mr. o.i.n.k. - "Apple has a way of making you feel inadequate" 3 January 2001
Here's a cool Isao Tomita related site with a bunch of images: http://listen.to/tomita 2 January 2001 REASON:: I've updated my budding Reason archive with the file list on a new page: [link deleted] Again, only list subscribers have exclusive access to these files! Included on this page is an archive of about 90 subtractor patches (usable with the demo version) which I 've been tweaking around with for the last month. I also posted another Reason Song which I can't seem to finish. There are some moments in there which someone may find useful - so feel free to copy n paste and hack 'n jack, etc. What? You don't know what the URL is? Maybe the next time I send out an e-mail notice, you'll be prepared by subscribing to the site news :) 1 January 2001 - Happy New Year TXT:: I hope everyone had a happy millennium eve. I had a great night out at Mecca in San Francisco. The highlight was definitely the music. Kim Nalley and the Johnny Nocturne Band, a local Blues and Jazz act, put on a really splendid performance (even got my tired old butt up and dancing). This site is usually about electronic music, but one can't live on distorted sawtooth waves and filter sweeps alone. Sometimes it's nice to see people who can "really" play ;-) On the downside - my chair had candlewax on it, and It smeared all over my trousers and the back of my jacket. I had a great time nonetheless! 28 December 2000 TXT:: Well My Reason Song Archive is starting up. I'll Probably be putting a few unfinished files up on there. Perhaps someone else can find them useful and finish them up or use them for inspiration for their own tracks. These will be reason song files (RNS)--not published song files (RPS)! For those people who subscribed and received the e-mail without the URL, I apologize. I sent a second e-mail sent which contains the URL for the archive page. Please don't distribute the Files or the URL, but do let me know if you do something cool with the files :-) I will probably change the URL periodically, and will keep people informed. I need to get Em to modify the e-mail script so that your addresses aren't listed in the header -- if this is even possible. --- UPDATE:: That little e-mail situation has been fixed. Thanks for your patience while we get the bugs worked out. To see more of Em's Handiwork, visit illequipped.com - the site that's really nothing about nothing. He's developing a little web community thingy where people can set up personal pages and upload files and stuff. 27 December 2000 TXT:: More site news. I've started up a e-mail subscription system for this site. Thanks to Emmet at illequipped.com, I can easily send out newsletters and stuff to anyone who subscribes to the site. The best part is that it's all automated and I wont have to worry about that stuff. Also, to launch this little subscription Mail List development campaign. I'm holding a little drawing for a Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player! This seems like a fairly cool unit (I don't even have one). There are some catches - so read the page carefully. Subscribers need only enter their e-mail. To be eligible for the drawing, you need to fill in the shipping information fields. Telephone number is optional. Click the Banner to subscribe: I realize that a lot of people will be discouraged to enter their name and address information to a list database, however, the main purpose is fairness. I don't want to have some people flooding the database with hundreds of Hotmail addresses to increase their chances in the drawing. That would be such a waste of bandwidth when I send out site update newsletters. I might add some CDs to the drawing as well - or maybe some other cool stuff... as usual, this is all still rather new to me, so it will evolve over time. I still can't believe I'm stooping to this level of dotcom-mercialization, but I suppose it's a necessary step if I plan to expand this little hobby into something bigger. I received some royalty checks from MP3.com the other day, and I still can't believe that they are paying artists out for downloads. This is pretty cool. However, MP3.com will be submitting a 1099 for the royalties and I need a tax write-off. I will probably owe a few hundred for those earnings, so I've already purchased the Rio 500 and will deduct the cost from my taxes. Instead of Uncle Sam getting that cash, someone will get the Rio :-) I'm still astonished that people even listen to some of the stuff I do. Thanks for everyone's support in the year 2000. I'm looking forward to 2001 - A Cyberspace Odyssey!
[Journal Archive] |